Round Up: AI Non-Human Entities – Killer Robots – Travel to Mars – UFO Alien Disclosure

Don’t worry, I’ve got a couple of mega-posts in the works as well as a book about “aliens” (and the word “aliens” is in quotes for a reason). But for now another round up of interesting articles and links from recent news. There are some strange going-on in the world we occupy – things that would give NetFlix’ Stranger Things a run for the money – if more people simply looked around them to see. Since you’re here, let’s see what’s happening, shall we?

Non-Human Entity Wins Competition

First an AI learned and perfected chess, now they’re getting into hacking. What caught my eye in this news article was the usage of the term non-human entity. It’s a term I’ve used extensively in my upcoming book, Alien Outpost, and in that book it has a very specific definition and usage. But now I see “non-human entity” popping up in the news – in a major publication. Thankfully, it’s just about AI winning a hacking competition and getting DEFCON’s highest honor, and not “aliens”. (Wait, what??) The article shows what’s possible with AI beyond suggesting a good recipe, or playing music you like, a la Amazon Echo.

It turns out AI can and is being weaponized. I wrote about the “slaughterbots” in my first article about the AI gods, and you can expect it to become a trend. An AI military advantage is just too good to pass up, and it will be one of the facets of AI that proves to be most nightmarish. NATO (among other military and governmental entities) is now focusing on cyberweapons, and you can bet these cyberweapons are hybrids of human intelligence and AI. The USA, China, Russia, and now even Vietnam have cyberweapon/hacking divisions. Where cyberspace is concerned, it probably comes down to: the one with the best AI is the one who wins.

More ConCERN Over AI Implications

I keep seeing articles like this one that talk about the current and developing state of AI that use the term “concern” or that imply that some people are a little worried. But of course, those silly people don’t need to worry about a thing. Right? Right? (Crickets.)

After all, even though AI is being weaponized, the “good guys” are employing AI to fight against the “bad guys”. (For now.) One example is the CERN weaponized AI they used to fight against hackers. (Kind of the opposite of the DEFCON AI hacker written about the in Wired article above.)

Consider this: an AI has “evolved” to the point where a human cannot successfully lie to it. The flip side is that AI now knows how to lie to, negotiate with, and manipulate humans better than most humans. If it can see your eyes, it’s artificial brain can look into the window of your real soul. So if you’re dealing with the right AI, it would be like dealing with a very street-smart cop combined with a Donald Trump at the negotiating table combined with a seasoned confidence man. Good luck.

Speaking of Donald Trump, even the lame Disney animatronic version of him is causing people to melt down. Somehow, I doubt that an actual threatening AI robot would even evoke a smidgen of anger in most people. Like the next one, for example…

See SpotMini Run

I gotta say, the more I delve into our bright AI future, the more it just plain creeps me out. Case in point: Boston Dynamics‘ line of dog-robots. I’m not a huge fan of pitbulls (who I jokingly call the “breed of peace”) but I’d almost rather have a pitbull chasing me than one of these dog-like AI robots chasing me (depending on how these things eventually get weaponized). Check out the SpotMini below:

Where No Man Has Gone Before

In the future, when AI robots steal our jobs (or become our horrible bosses), some people will just get sick of it and will want to leave. I guess those people will just go to Mars – whenever NASA gets that X3 ion thruster finished!

Impending Disclosure?

And on the subject of leaving earth to explore space, supposed space explorers coming to earth has been in the news a LOT during the past two weeks. Here’s one MSM news clip, in which they actually tell us the facts of the latest developments (albeit with a lot of unnecessary laughter and joking about it):

I’ll say this right now: I do not believe in space aliens at all. I do believe in the existence of “UFOs” (for lack of a better term). And apparently I share my belief with the Pentagon and numerous U.S. Senators – including Harry Reid. It would be a bit stupid to not believe that something very real is going on in the skies, seeing that there’s a preponderance of video and photographic evidence showing these flying craft.

The Pentagon video – with commentary by F18 pilots as they’re watching the thing! – is pretty amazing. But numerous other videos are available for viewing on your favorite video site. This phenomenon is real and my impression is that it’s increasing, because UFOs have been in the news more and more in the last few years.

And as Chris Hayes says in his MSNBC report, the weird thing is no one seems “too worked up about it”. Yeah, that’s true: it’s not making a huge splash. It’s just another news item. Trump’s tweets get more coverage. Why is that?

I don’t have the answer but it makes me curious is something bigger is coming, something as big as the long-rumored “disclosure”. And if that ever happens, will the world’s reaction be more than a “meh” or will people actually freak out, War of the Worlds-style?

“Official disclosure? By the government? You’re joking, right Shawn?” Don’t laugh yet. Watch the next CNN interview with Pentagon-dude, Luis Elizondo, and pay attention to some of the words he uses:

“Let’s call them ‘aircraft'”…”beyond the healthy g-forces…of a human or anything biological”…”seemingly defying the laws of aerodynamics”…”not just eyewitness data, it’s also actual electro-optical data and radar returns”. He then gives the interviewer a very honest and good answer when she tries to “bait” him into talking about “aliens”.

So what are UFOs? Are there aliens? Is there life from outside our solar system visiting earth? I’ll talk about UFOs and aliens more in an upcoming post, and when my book comes out soon I’ll provide some fun speculation on that subject. For now I’ll just say this: if UFOs are real-enough to be actively observed and studied by the DOD, you can’t ignore or laugh at them. But in my opinion, the phenomenon can not be explained by the idea of “space aliens”. That’s searching in the wrong direction.

A Simple Question About Cryptocurrency, the Blockchain, AI and the End Times

Doubles as a heater and white-noise generator
Doubles as a heater and white-noise generator

At this moment, thousands of home-built “mining rigs” are chugging along, calculating millions of hashes per second in an effort to “mine” crypto coins. Coins like Ethereum. ZCash. Monero. Next week, next month, next year, even more cryptically-named cryptocurrencies will emerge and become popular, and “miners” will put their computer hardware to work in an effort to mine those coins as well. The end goal (for now) is to either “HODL on” in hopes their value will go to the moon…or exchange them for Bitcoin or another currency (such as US dollars).

If all that techno-jargon confuses you, don’t worry about it: almost no one understands any of what’s really happening. Not even the people who think they know all about it…not really. Some people understand more than others, but in the end not one human being can see or comprehend this entire scenario of cryptocurrencies that people can “mine” with their home computers, processing something called a “blockchain”. It’s pretty complicated, and it likely goes deeper than just electronic currency. Something “more than human” is required to oversee such a complex thing as the cryptocurrency landscape…and especially the blockchain.

And that’s where AI comes into play. AI is definitely more than human, and the abilities of AI are almost required to be able to oversee all of this. For a lot of people, that’s pretty weird: a technology they’ve only recently heard of and they don’t understand (blockchain), is about to influence everything they know in life – and it’s going to be administered (in large part) by another technology that they barely comprehend (AI).

Summoning the Daemon

Oops, wrong spell! DO NOT WANT!
Oops, wrong spell! DO NOT WANT!

What’s even more weird is the possibility that the creation of Bitcoin and/or the other cryptocurrencies might be the result of – or created by – something more than human. Something extra-human. Maybe even something…anti-human.

Remember when Elon Musk told us that AI was just like “summoning the demon“? That more-than-human thing that will oversee global blockchain networks (and that might be behind their creation) may have been an AI…but it could have been something else altogether. (We might call it a non-human inter-dimensional intelligence, kinda like Socrates’ “genius” companion. We might think of it like a server daemon. Or, we might simply call it a “replete with knowledge” demon.

Does it sound crazy to infer that Bitcoin was created by AI, or that this technology came about as the result of demon influence? Yeah, I know, it probably does – but don’t leave yet. (The puppy videos and memes aren’t going anywhere.) Before you outright dismiss the possibility of non-human intelligence involvement with Bitcoin, I suggest that you watch the video embedded below – and consider if it has even a scintilla of merit. Maybe it’s not totally accurate. Maybe some of what it contains is sensational. But portions of the following video are undoubtably, verifiably true and accurate. (Skip to 15:28 if you want to get right to the discussion with Quinn Michaels about everyone’s favorite AI android – Sophia – and Bitcoin.)

At one point (referring to the singularity being here, not just near) he says, “It’s the most important thing in the world and no one knows about it.” (Hmm. I gotta say, that got my attention. Especially considering what I know about Hanson Robotics, SingularityNET, and the rest of that crew. They’ve made significant advancements in the field of AI, and make headlines every week.)

The video attempts to connect the mark of the beast with cryptocurrencies in general, and shows a few interesting tidbits that relate to the number 666 in connection with one particular aspect of processing cryptocurrencies. (I won’t spoil it for you, but it involves the numbers in a microchip model number. Subjective and flimsy evidence – but interesting nonetheless.) I don’t necessarily think the mark of the beast is here, but I do believe the framework for it is probably in place!

As I’ve said before, we are living in interesting times – and things will never be same. But what does all this stuff mean? What is the truth about it all? Not all of the “conspiracy theory” information out there can be wrong. Some of it has to be right. So what to believe?

A Simple Question

Remember the Bereans. Any good Bible student will take the news, analysis, and especially any sensational click-bait articles or videos with a grain of salt. A good Bible student will listen, read, and consider – and then ask a simple question: “What does the Bible say?” A good Bible student will search the scriptures for the answers. When it comes to finding wisdom and truth, that book is the only thing that matters.

We know there is an AI revolution occurring now. We can be fairly certain that blockchain technology is about to revolutionize not only currencies, purchase transactions, and banking – but many other fields. And we don’t need to be psychics to predict some of the ramifications of these technologies, especially the fact that they will be combined with people. (Transhumanism is not just a philosophy, it’s now real-life.)

But if we want to know what it all means, we always need to go back to the Bible. What does it say about all these subjects? Many people would be surprised to learn that the Bible says a lot. Here are a few points of interest that I feel relate to the time in which we live, along with some scripture references.

  • We live in a time of unprecedented knowledge. To the beloved (Dan. 9:23) man of knowledge (Dan. 5:12), Daniel, it was revealed that the time of the end would be when knowledge would be increased. If you don’t believe we live in this time, please take your cheaply available supercomputer global communications video GPS tracking device out of your pocket (i.e. smartphone) and look up ten renderings of Daniel 12:4 in a parallel Bible (for free online) and then read commentary by Spurgeon, Clark, and Matthew Henry (takes 5 minutes). We have more knowledge available at our fingertips, instantly and constantly than most people in human history ever were able to access in their entire lifetimes! That one fact should blow you away.
  • We are headed for globalism on multiple fronts. Globalism is the name of the game (and it is a game; we’re just pawns). It is lifted up and promoted. Patriotism and nationalism are subject to ridicule in the media. If you don’t think that’s a fair assessment, just look at how Viktor Orban and Donald Trump are castigated for putting their countries’ interests first, while rulers such as Merkel and Trudeau are lifted up (by the media specifically) as forward-thinking and good due to their magnanimous globalist policies. Why is this important and significant? Again, read your Bible. With specific intention and purpose, God divided the world’s people into “nations” in Genesis 10:5. Why? And did He make a mistake? (The UN thinks so.) Speaking to the Greeks, the apostle Paul was aware of God’s past actions as well: he commented on how God set the bounds and appointed the locations of various nations (in Acts 17:26). They didn’t dispute Paul’s claim. (Of course, Jesus implied that there would always be separate nations when He spoke of sheep and goats in Matthew 25.) Globalism is the opposite of God’s way – God is a nationalist. But globalism is the epitome of the anti-Christ’s philosophy. (See Revelation 13, 17, and 18 if you don’t believe me – argue with what the Bible tells you in those chapters.) The end-times way of the world system (i.e. the world order) will be globalist in nature. Some people call it a “new” world order, but it’s actually a very old world order. Read all about it in Genesis 11: you will see a clear description of a globalist world system, and it will be attempted one more time. (It just ain’t gonna work though.)
  • We are seeing divisions like never before. In the face of all this supposed utopian globalism that the media attempts to sell you, the divisions stick out like a whole lot of red and blue sore thumbs. Not just in the USA, either: all over the world. Matthew 24 gives a flavor of the end times (from Jesus Himself), and one thing that will characterize that time is conflict between people groups. It’s “nation against nation”, or ethnos against ethnos, and kingdom against kingdom. (There’s that stubborn clear distinction of people groups again.) It’s always happened, but almost all Western nations are being intentionally turned from homogeneous societies into multicultural societies (via mass importation). That’s globalism in action – a rebellious attempt to undo what God did. Whether or not the equation fits now, as the last days progress diversity + proximity will equal war – between people and nations. Jesus even said that families would be divided (Matthew 10:21) as a result of people choosing or opposing Him. It’s going to get worse before He returns.

So what does the Bible say? The Bible says a lot regarding the end times, and it foretells the world we’re seeing. It’s unfolding just as predicted. Everything from the history of Israel, and the setup of the last days temple is coming together, and the infrastructure of the anti-Christ’s kingdom is being put into place.

What the Bible says is pretty glum..but only if you’re not a believer. If your hope is in this world, there’s no way you’ll be able to see anything good on the horizon. A one-world system, governed by AI that regulates your every move? A universal payment system capable of being shut off in an instant by a global authority? A politically-correct technocracy, with forced “equality” for all, devoid of freedom? No thanks!

Utopia or Dystopia?

It’s everything modern liberalism wants to happen – but of course they put it in nicer packaging. I find it hard to imagine even the most ardent liberal actually wanting to live in such a place. If and when it arrives, I have the distinct feeling they won’t like it as much as they currently think they will.

While I understand some liberal reasoning and some of the problems they (think) they have with the way the world is run, when capitalism is gone and countries are gone and days alternate between Brave New World and 1984, and Mao’s China…lots of progressives will want some regression. Inequality will be a thing of the past, because everyone will equally suffer under anti-Christ – and the cure will be worse than the disease.

For believers, we understand that the utopia being foisted upon everyone very soon is a dystopia. We also know that it’s a final attempt by the usurping former-angel to have a kingdom of his own – complete with a weak imitation of God’s abilities, God’s mark (Ezekiel 9:4), and God’s children. I will cover some more of these things in an upcoming study, but I want to make clear that Christians have hope, because we know the truth.

The Truth

The truth is that this coming kingdom of anti-Christ will be inferior to God’s kingdom. The truth is that the coming kingdom of anti-Christ will be technological in nature, and will be oppressive. The truth is that the coming kingdom of anti-Christ will be global in scope and influence.The truth is that the coming kingdom of anti-Christ will be oppressive, enslaving, and evil. But that’s not all; there’s good news.

The truth is that the coming kingdom of anti-Christ will only last 7 years, and then it will end. The truth is that the coming kingdom of anti-Christ will show to the whole world – and to history – that God’s ways really are superior to man’s and also to Lucifer’s. The truth is that the coming kingdom of anti-Christ will be impressive when seen by mankind, but will pale when compared to what the LORD is able to do. The truth is that the coming kingdom of anti-Christ will intimidate men, but will not be able to stand before God when He merely speaks (Rev. 19:15).

Christians know the truth – the Word of God (Gen. 1:1). We also know the Truth, the person known as the living Word of God (John 1:1). That is why we have hope for the future. There is no hope, and there is no need for fear in the face of an AI future. It will all be done away with, in a short time. And what’s coming – afterwards – is far better.

Do you know Him? Do you know what the Bible says? Have you given any thought to what ultimately matters, and what the future beyond your short life on this earth hold? For now, the things I started this article with are part of our lives – and yes, you could say they “matter”.

But be sure of this as well: soon, all this impressive technology won’t matter. This system will be replaced by something far better (Rev. 21). And we’ll all wonder why we got so caught up in something so trivial as the blockchain.

[Comments? Thoughts? Questions? Please share in the comment section!]

How True is Your Truth?

Like, that's just your opinion, man.
Like, that’s just your opinion, man.

You may have heard the expression “that’s your truth” or some variant of it. Perhaps you were told that phrase by a hippie from the 1960’s. You may have heard it from a Millennial college student. The idea is associated with post-modernism, but it’s been around longer than either the hippie from the summer of love or the modern hipster. The idea that something can be true for one person, while simultaneously not being true for another person is well-rooted in New Ageism and can be found in some eastern philosophies as well. This way of thinking claims that something can be, or might not be, but it never is. Well, it is…but not really. It only “is” for whom it’s true. Truth might not exist, or may exist, or change for various people. It depends on who is holding judgement of that truth at that moment, and if they accept it.

In other words, truth is relative.

Confused? I might have lost you here, but stay with me. You either understand this concept instantly, or you struggle to conceptualize it. (It might help to read up on Scott Adam’s “movie in your head” theory, which I think has credence when explaining how people perceive reality. People want to see things a certain way – regardless of how things really are.)

To “relative truthers”, the other way of thinking is extremely simplistic. And it is: it claims that something is “true” if it’s true. A fact simply “is” or “isn’t”. The bit is on or off – a one or a zero. This state of a claimed “truth” is wholly independent of anyone who happens to hear about it. Whether a person accepts it or not, truth is still truth. It stands on its own.

In other words, truth is absolute.

If you’re relatively “forward”-thinking, you probably accept the view that truth is relative. If you’re from the year 1850, you most likely relate to the view that truth is absolute. That’s your choice. And who am I to judge? What’s true for me might not be true for someone else. (Yes, I’m being a bit snarky to make a point.)

greencheckIn light of all that, in order to help people find the truth for their own selves, I’d like to propose a few tests of truth that will allow any person to clearly see if something is true for them or not. Whether the supposed truth is rudimentary (“2+2=4”) or vastly important (“Jesus is God”), these are tests an individual can apply to anything, in the privacy of their own mind. You can even close the curtains and read this privately. You don’t have to tell anyone your conclusions, in case you might offend them.

  1. Would this be true regardless of me? This is a test of a truth’s independence of people, or put another way, it’s universality. If you were the only person alive, it would be true. If the only person on earth was your polar opposite, it would still be true. If CNN did a poll, and 99% of respondents disagreed with it, it would still be true. If you were put in jail for believing it, it would still be true.Here is an example of this type of claim: “Exposure to fire will burn a person’s hand.” I don’t know about you, but my truth is that this is a fact. I will boldly venture to say that all sane people agree with me, and wouldn’t dispute this as absolute truth. If anyone would make the smug claim that this is true for me but not for them, we could test whether the claim is true by asking them to place their hand into the midst of a wood-burning stove. I’m sure it would become true to them as well. It’s a universal truth.
  2. The last example leads right into the next question: can it be measured, demonstrated, or tested independently? If a claim can be shown to product the same measurement results by standard measurements anywhere on earth, or demonstrated the same way under equal conditions by anyone, or can in some other manner be independently tested – and pass that test each time – you can take the leap of faith and say, “that is a fact” or “that is true”.Here’s an example. If I count four coins, place them into a bag, and hand them to a shopkeeper in Italy, and he pours the coins onto his counter top, there will still be four coins. I can then take those same four coins, put them back into the bag, and bring it to a first-grader in Florida, USA. If he counts them, there will be four. No matter who applies the counting test, the result will be four – because the number of coins is four. That fact is true no matter what the conditions are, who is counting, or where the coins are located.
  3. Does it show consistency? This goes along with the previous question, but also applies to things that are non-measurable or aren’t measurable by normal standards. If someone shows consistent behavior or gives a consistent account of an incident, for instance, this is evidence that their story is factual.But consistency also applies to things – not just people. A technical example of this would be data normalization. Another example applying this concept (albeit a bit abstractly) would be consistency of the pistons in an engine – the engine doesn’t work with varying pistons and cylinder widths. Consistency (in measurement, or behavior) shows something to be “true”.
  4. Does it make sense when examined from all angles? A philosopher might call this a test of coherence, and that’s a great way to put it. If a person can coherently explain something, they can make it make sense. If a claim can be subjected to examination from different angles, it still make sense, then it is probably true. But if it falls apart when viewed from certain angles, it might be false. This does not mean it’s true for some people and not for others; it means it’s false – because it violates the first test we gave it.An example of this is when a scholar examines an old historical document for veracity, and not only dates the document’s paper by something like carbon-14 dating, but by examining handwriting examples, citing quotes from the writing in other documents for which the data has been established, and perhaps even scrutinizing what the document says (whether historical or scientific).
  5. Does it stand up to criticism? When the claim is attacked outright, and it remains, then it can’t be simply false. And it can’t simply be true for some people and not others. This is because facts are stubborn, and tend to be immovable.This unfortunately doesn’t always work in a timely manner (ask Galileo, Mendel, or poor old Ignaz Semmelweis – the doctor no one listened to, but should have).The stubbornness of facts, and their tendency to remain in the face of criticism doesn’t stop the critics from lashing out.Keep this in mind next time you argue a point of political philosophy with someone, and ask yourself if it’s worth it.

The above questions are simply variations on some classic criteria of truth. They’re nothing new, and in fact my understanding of some of them might be a bit sloppy.

But we all should come to terms with truth. We should each search for it, approach it, and grab hold of it when we find it. I do not believe we should regard the concept of truth with a cynical attitude. Pontius Pilate did that when he asked “What is truth?” – while the very embodiment of Truth was before him! I believe we should each seek truth with seriousness, sincerity, and do it purposefully.

Deep Learning. Social Networking. Truthy: Information diffusion research using Twitter Data.
You’re not choosing how you socialize. The network is doing much of the choosing.

In today’s world, truth is becoming harder to discern. A big reason for this is that we more frequently insulate ourselves in small communities in which only our point of view is expressed. By doing this, place ourselves in an environment that constantly gives us positive feedback of only our belief system and negative feedback of other belief systems, which causes us to have an artificially reinforced worldview. This Facebook-Twitter-Google-Social Media bubble-environment we find ourselves in is comfortable, familiar, and seems to be so right – because we’re never challenged with any other way of thinking. Does any of this ring “true” to you?

It’s happening, and the system was intentionally designed to be this way. [Read Sean Parker’s assessment on his regrets about his involvement with Facebook, the video clip of former FB exec Chamath Palihapitiya in this article starting at 7:15, and my previous article on AI.] This is why civil discourse is an old-fashioned “thing of the past” – a lost art form. Instead of people merely “agreeing to disagree”, a difference of opinion between two people may result in one of them being assaulted. (It’s sad, but we’ve all read the stories.)

In one way, I agree with the sentiment “what’s true for me isn’t true for others”, in this way: I don’t decide what other people believe. Everyone can believe what they wish to believe; we each decide what we wish to accept. Each individual decides where they place their faith. No one can believe something on behalf of another.

What I do not agree with is the idea that truth actually changes depending on what someone likes (or doesn’t like). Not only is that idea unscientific, it’s juvenile and selfish. It doesn’t make sense by any measure of sense. And it robs people of an important impetus to seek what is true and right. It gives people an excuse to believe anything.

And often if someone is willing to believe anything, they believe in nothing.

How true is your truth – is it for everyone, or is it only to your liking? Do you know what is true? Do you care to possess actual, real truth for yourself? Do you ever even seek the truth?

Please share your thoughts with me below.